In last week’s Radar Report, I said that I would not be surprised to see the S&P 500 run up to significant resistance at 1415, and then show a 10-point drop in an hour after 1415 was hit. Well, the very next day the S&P hit 1408, and after a low-volume drift down during last Friday’s half-day session, it dropped 14 points in two hours on Monday and closed almost 26 points below last Wednesday’s high. That probably marked the phase change in the market I’ve been waiting for.
It is normal for the market to rally back to test the breakdown point from below, which is happening in today’s, and the past couple days’, action. Most of the media commentary that I’ve seen is calling this a “buy the dip” opportunity, and there is very little fear that the drop earlier this week could develop into something worse. Assuming that the market can’t get through 1408 for any meaningful length of time, I’m looking for the S&P to drop below 1377 to1380, which would then set off a scary plunge below 1300 and take some of the complacency out of the market. If we get this immediate plunge that I’m looking for, it will be time for us to reload for the two-year bull market that is about to begin.
I think that would be the best scenario to set up a good market run in 2007, even as the economy slows. But if we see a different pattern of a W-shaped top with several touches of 1415 before the real decline gets underway, I would be concerned that the whole first half of 2007 could be marked by a bear market. An even worse scenario would be if the market breaks through 1415 and spikes up to 1440. Because then the stage would be set for a really dramatic decline of 250 to 300 points. Although, judging by the action in the market so far, that is a low-probability scenario. Insiders are very tilted to the sell side right now, and any higher prices would be met by even heavier selling that should prevent the S&P from hitting the 1440 level. But it is still in the realm of possibility that the S&P could breach that level, so I’m not ready to rule it out completely just yet.
Consumer Spending
Right now, the fundamental driver of market weakness is the economic weakness that is finally becoming obvious to most investors. Yesterday’s small upward revision in the September-quarter GDP growth rate from 1.6% to 2.2% was met by comments like: “This report will go a long way toward marginalizing the market’s recession fears” from Action Economics, and “The upward revised real GDP data is a perfect recipe for a ‘soft landing’ economic soufflé” from the chief economist for PNC Bank.
But the upward revision came from a greater building of inventories than was originally assumed, which is bad news for production in the current quarter, and lower imports, which signals a weaker consumer. In fact, consumer spending was slightly slower than first thought. So, inventories are higher and the consumer is weaker than previously thought — this is supposed to marginalize recession fears and suggest a soft landing? I don’t think so.
I am watching how the holiday retail season develops, but the early read is that spending is up due to huge discounts being offered earlier than last year, not because consumers are feeling great about increasing their budgets for the whole season. The Black Friday weekend showed an impressive 18.9% spending increase from last year due to the one-time discounts on loss-leader, limited quantities of LCD TVs, home theatres and such. I am watching the sales numbers closely to track what the consumer is really doing and thinking, and I don’t think the strength will hold up, but that’s just a guess — we’ll let the ongoing numbers guide us. I’ll be quick to say that I was wrong if last weekend’s spending growth rate continues. But Wal-Mart reporting their worst monthly sales growth since 1996 is not a good omen for the soft landing thesis.
The housing market also remains very weak, in spite of a small uptick in the sale of existing homes, thanks to lower mortgage rates. Home prices fell or were flat in seven of 10 major U.S. metropolitan areas in September compared with August, and annual price gains slowed to their lowest rate in nine years. Prices fell in the District of Columbia, Boston, Denver, New York, San Diego and San Francisco. As I said last week, it is not good sign for economic growth if the housing market is declining, as housing accounted for 40% of the growth and job creation in the last upturn.
A Bold Move?
We all knew that one of the biggest U.S. industries was in deep trouble, but I found yesterday’s news from Ford Motor Company shocking. They said that 38,000 of their 83,000 blue-collar union workers have accepted an employment buyout. They are cutting 46% of their production workforce! They had previously expected to cut 25,000 to 30,000 by the end of 2008 — cutting 38,000 by the end of 2006 is a real body blow to the Midwest economy. Ford also said that it will borrow $18 billion to “fund its restructuring and cushion against a possible recession.”
Yes, a very cyclical company is leveraging itself up with debt going into a recession. Why would they do that? I think the primary reason is that if you know you are going to be cash flow negative for a long time, you borrow all the money you can anywhere you can to try to survive. The less likely possibility is that they are going to put it in the bank, and then they’ll have it to buy assets cheaply at the bottom of the downturn. But Ford seems to be shrinking, not growing, so I think the first reason is far more likely.
What Can Those 38,000 People Do?
Learn computers and Internet marketing. Go online. Start a small service business. And make more money than they did as UAW (United Auto Workers) members.
Today is a day to celebrate Moore’s Law. I’ve talked about this from time to time. Gordon Moore, a founder and former CEO of Intel, coined Moore’s Law, which states that the cost of doing anything with a computer would fall 50% every 18 months. Today, that inexorable decline brought the cost of executing one million instructions per second (MIPS) below one penny. The new Intel Core Duo processor that runs at 2.13 gigahertz, which equates to just over 20,000 MIPS, is down to $200 retail and about $180 for volume purchases. If you divide $200 by 20,000 MIPS, you get one penny per MIPS.
When I started my first technology investment newsletter in 1982, I bought an IBM PC with an Intel 80286 processor running at six megahertz that could do 0.9 MIPS. The computer cost me $3,000, and then I paid another $2,000 for a five megabyte Seagate hard disk drive. As I recall, the processor alone sold retail for $950, so my cost per MIPS was about $1,055. Thanks to Moore’s Law, the cost of computing went from $1,055 per MIPS to one penny in 24 years, almost to the day. A megabyte of disk storage today costs three cents, down from $400 per megabyte when I bought my Seagate drive in 1982. DRAM storage costs have been on a similar downward spiral.
And that, folks, is why the technology revolution is unstoppable. I had been worried that Moore’s Law might run out of gas around 2010 to 2012, because that’s as far as the semiconductor equipment roadmap goes, based on current technology. But Intel told me that they now think they know how to stay on the Moore’s Law curve past 2020. That means every ordinary $1,000 multimedia PC will have the intelligence of a human being by 2018 — a 24/7 assistant that never takes coffee breaks or vacations, and never wants a raise. The changes coming in our society — the way we work, play, recreate, communicate and live — are going to be bigger than what we’ve seen in the last 24 years. That’s why I hope as many of those Ford workers as possible spend their buyout bonus on getting computer/Internet training and starting a business — the opportunities in the tech sector are immeasurable.
I know that changing one’s thinking from the economics of scarcity to the economics of abundance is not easy. But “freeconomics” means looking at your numerous racks of CDs and thinking: “Wait a minute — if the electronics are free, why can’t I carry 10,000 songs in my pocket?”
A column by Michael Schrage in the Financial Times talked about the power of free: “Never in history has so much innovation been offered to so many for so little. The world’s most exciting businesses — technology, transport, media, medicine and finance — are increasingly defined by the word ‘free’. Whereas Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, promises ‘everyday low prices,’ entrepreneurs and ultra-competitive incumbents develop business models predicated on providing more for free. It is a difficult proposition to beat.”
If that isn’t enough change for you, the brilliant and often-accurate technology forecaster Ray Kurzweil says that by 2020 we’ll start to see the merger of computer and human intelligence, which will eventually enable people to live forever. Kurzweil’s book, The Singularity Is Near, forecasts that by the late 2020s, nanobots the size of blood cells will travel through your bloodstream, fixing diseased or aging organs. By the late 2030s, computers will back up human memories. Around the same time, scientists will transform your skin cells into young versions of other cell types, then grow those cells into new, young organs, and transplant them to rejuvenate your body to stay eternally young and healthy. Or they may just infuse the new cells and let them find and rejuvenate the organ they are targeting. If you can make it another 15 to 30 years, you have a good chance of living forever. Before that great day, Kurzweil says the common cold will be history within 10 years.
By 2045, collective computer intelligence will be one billion times as much as total human intelligence today, and computers will design and manufacture their own upgrades — no human will be able to understand exactly what is going on. Technological progress in the 21st century will be about 1,000 times as much as that in the 20th century. By the early 2020s, instead of making a cell phone call we will “meet” someone in a virtual world, take a walk with them in a virtual park and talk. Conference “calls” will turn into virtual meetings in places like Maui, or maybe a factory in Thailand that is the subject of the call. When you are walking down the street and see someone you’ve met before, their name and background info will be projected on your retina. Retinal projection will replace CRT and LCD computer displays and TVs.
Whether it’s taking place in a laboratory or someone’s garage, the drive for new technology is already in gear and the groundwork is being laid. And while I know that many of these innovations are years away, there are still plenty of interesting products and opportunities out there right now. Some are even the most popular items on store shelves. So, in next week’s issue, I’m going to talk about the hottest technology gifts for this holiday season — some widely known, and some surprises. That’s an issue I’ll be able to write every year for the rest of this century, and if Kurzweil is correct, I’ll be around to write it and there will be no shortage of MegaShifts for us to invest in — ever.
Until those technologies develop, we’ll continue to profit from innovation and news events in our present-day MegaShifts.
Avian Flu MegaShift
In a bizarre response to a confirmed case of H5N1 bird flu in domestic chickens, South Korean officials plan to kill 236,000 chickens and destroy six million eggs within a 1,650-foot radius of the outbreak site. That’s a circle with a diameter of five-eighths of a mile, so those chickens are really packed in. They are also going to kill all the pigs, which some other Asian countries have done in similar circumstances. But here’s the bizarre part — they are going to slaughter all the dogs and cats in the area, even though there is no evidence that the virus passes from dogs or cats to humans. Apparently, they did the same thing in 2003, and now like good bureaucrats, they have a precedent and don’t have to think about it.
I had a question from Dave: “Since you follow Avian Flu closely, I wanted to get your opinion on a small company that has an anti-bacterial hand soap that has a 99.9% effectiveness at killing avian flu on contact and continues up to four hours. SKVI is the company and it seems pretty cheap if avian flu gets worse. Any feedback on this stock is greatly appreciated.”
Like all viruses, H5N1 can be killed by temperatures of 107 degrees or above, just a bit warmer than the average hot tub. That’s why your body responds to an infection with an elevated temperature — it is trying to kill the invaders. Of course, 107 degrees internally will make an adult feel terrible, but 107 degrees on your hands is just hot water. Any hand soap probably will do the same thing, and there’s no special reason an anti-bacterial soap would kill a virus. Skinvisible (SKVI) does have technology that holds the anti-bacterial material on the skin for longer than regular soap, but this 26-cent stock with a $17 million market cap, five employees and no earnings doesn’t look cheap to me.
Gilead (GILD) drew a question from Jennifer: “I am interested in buying the 2008 LEAP. Why do you suggest buying the $50 strike price instead of the $65 strike price? The current GILD price is $66.55.”
My original target for GILD by the expiration of the 2008 January $50 LEAP (YGDAJ) was $70, when the common stock was at $50. I was, and am still, looking for a $30 target for the LEAP, which then cost less than $10. The $65 contract would cost you over $10 now, so you would lose money at the expiration. Of course, GILD could be much higher by January 2008 if the H5N1 virus shows up in the U.S. or goes airborne in Asia. That would make the $65 contract a winner, too. But instead of scaling up with an additional recommendation of a January 2008 LEAP with a higher strike price, I would much rather see you load up on BioCryst (BCRX) at these levels. It costs about the same as the Gilead $65 LEAP, has the same $30 target as the January 2008 Gilead contract and never expires. Plus, at this time, both Gilead LEAPs are rated as a hold, not buy.
Biotech MegaShift
Affymetrix (AFFX) will benefit from new research published in Nature, Nature Genetics and Genome Research that showed individuals’ DNA can differ by as much as 10%. The accepted wisdom is that everyone on earth is 99.9% identical genetically, but this research compared DNA from 270 healthy people in China, Japan, Nigeria and the United States and found segments of genetic duplications and deletions called copy number variants (CNVs) that are as important as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in explaining the differences between people. The CNVs explain how genes are involved in common diseases. For instance, resistance to infection by HIV is determined in part by multiple copies of the gene CCL3L1, which cannot be seen on a SNPs map. The researchers identified 1,447 different CNVs that cover about 12% of the human genome. About 285 of them are associated with diseases, including schizophrenia, psoriasis, coronary heart disease and congenital cataracts.
This basic research, done on AFFX equipment, led the vice chairman of the Department of Molecular and Human Genetics at the Baylor College of Medicine to say: “I believe this paper will change forever the field of human genetics. One can no longer consider human traits as resulting primarily from single base-pair changes or influenced only by SNPs.”
I had a question on AFFX from Bob: “I have a concern about AFFX. I wanted to hear your response to the thesis of shorting AFFX. The short argument is based on deteriorating fundamentals and market share; that customers are discontinuing use of AFFX’s systems; that ILMN is killing AFFX in genotyping; that AFFX is cutting prices and experiencing a declining gross margin; a rumor about customer concerns regarding the accuracy of AFFX’s expression data; and, another rumor that AFFX’s salesforce is weak (or, at least not as knowledgeable as that of ILMN). What do you think of all of this?”
I like Illumina (ILMN), although I think it is an expensive stock. The company specializes in genotyping, which is identifying the SNPs that cause genetic variations between individuals. They are acquiring Solexa, which focuses more on a macro approach to genetic sequencing, similar to the Affymetrix approach. That eventually should help them in the new world of CSVs as another cause of genetic variations.
Almost all of Affymetrix’ current problems, which created this buying opportunity, relate to getting their next-generation product into the market. To answer your specific questions, the new product is now selling and will eliminate the worries about deteriorating market share and customers discontinuing using AFFX gear. Illumina does do better than AFFX in genotyping today, but that has been a much smaller part of the market. Illumina will have to scramble to catch AFFX in identifying CSVs.
The broad genetic sequencing market is a billion dollar opportunity today, growing over 25% a year, so there is plenty of room for two or three winners. The periodic “accuracy of the data” rumor is just competitor talk. The sales force issue has a kernel of truth, as Affymetrix’ delays in getting their new product out caused some good salespeople to bail, often to Illumina. But there’s nothing like a hot new product to attract new salespeople.
I would like to own both Affymetrix and Illumina, but the opportunity today is to buy AFFX under my $24 limit in a broad market decline for my $40 target. During some future period when the hedge funds and momentum players clobber ILMN because they admit the Solexa acquisition will be dilutive in 2008 (which it will be, even though the company said it would be accretive), we will buy that one, too. Genetic expression is at the core of the Biotech MegaShift.
QLT (QLTI) drew a question from Russell: “On October 26, QLT gave a poor outlook for sales of Visudyne. Why are you hopeful? Is the stock at highs based on their other products? If we are in it because of Visudyne, is it time to sell?”
The stock went up because of their Dutch auction repurchase of shares, and also due to some positive clinical results. But we are in it because I believe that macular degeneration will be treated by combination therapies: Visudyne plus Lucentis, Visudyne plus Macugen, etc. That’s because the mechanism of action of Visudyne is totally different from Lucentis and Macugen, and there is no reason for doctors to not use combination therapy when so much is at stake. So far, Wall Street does not believe this scenario. But there are combination clinical trials underway, and I think QLT is a low-risk buy on dips under $8 for my first target of $16. I think we will see even higher levels before we sell this stock.
Content on Demand MegaShift
Telkonet (TKO) was the subject of an email from Cecile: “One year ago you wrote that the target price for ’06 should be $15! Now one year later it is at $2.70. What do you think about this stock for the next months? Are you still sure that your target price is achievable by the end of the year or at the beginning of next year?”
I still think TKO is going to be a $15 stock, but not by the end of the year or early next year. At this point, my target prices are “by the end of 2007,” with some being achieved earlier in the year and some later. TKO has some potentially explosive drivers, such as the military contract with EDS, that make the $15 target realistic. Buy TKO under $5 for my $15 target in 2007.
New Energy Technology MegaShift
The prices of oil and natural gas are rising as cold weather settles in, usage draws down stocks, and OPEC still leans towards further production cuts. T. Boone Pickens, who has correctly predicted rising energy prices for the past three years, said that U.S. crude oil will average $70 a barrel in 2007. He explained: “I keep thinking we’re right at the bottom on oil. I don’t see why the run is over if the global economy continues to grow.”
This is one of the big drivers for our New Energy Technology stocks. The other is the strategic desire to be much less dependent on importing oil from the volatile Middle East and a bunch of countries that don’t like us. Although these recommendations are up from their lows, this MegaShift is still an excellent place to put money for the next several years. The buy limits and target prices are listed on the website. My Top Buys include Connacher Oil & Gas (T.CLL) under $4.50 for a $7 target, Gasco Energy (GSX) under $4.50 for a $9 target, Infinity Energy Resources (IFNY) under $5 for my $9 target and Rentech (RTK) under $5 for an $11 target.
New Materials MegaShift
Integral Technologies (ITKG) went over my $4 target this week. The reason for the sudden jump up is that it is being promoted by another newsletter, and therefore, I think it could fall back from here. But this is a multiyear holding for us, and I don’t think we should try to time every little squiggle in the stock. I would not be surprised to see the stock back at $3 or over $5 in a month. Instead of selling, let’s watch what develops, and I will try to raise my buy limit to meet any meaningful dip, and give you a second chance to get on board or expand your holdings. Hold ITKG for now.
WiMAX MegaShift
MobilePro (MOBL) paid about $663,000 of the principal and interest due on their convertible note in stock, issuing 7,921,296 shares at an average price of 8.37 cents per share. The company had hoped to avoid the dilution of 1.4% by raising cash elsewhere, and there is another similar payment due in mid-February. I don’t like to see them issuing shares at such a low price anymore than you, or anymore than management, for that matter. The company needs to find a strategic partner to resolve this overhanging drain on the number of shares outstanding.
The stock has been weak because scheduled payments of $125,000 of principal are to be made weekly commencing January 2, 2007, and it is up to management to find a way to make them in cash instead of in stock. There are numerous valuable pieces in MOBL that can be sold or monetized to avoid further dilution. The company is not going to run out of money and disappear, as subscriber John worried — Cornell Capital is supplying them plenty of cash, but it is expensive money.
Dave asked: “I was wondering why there is so much insider selling going on with this stock at such a low price. It almost feels like desperate selling. Would appreciate your feedback.”
The only insider activity, filed on Form 4, is the CEO buying the stock around the first of every month — 31,000 shares in August, 26,000 in September, 33,000 in October and 41,000 in November. He buys about $5,000 worth of stock every month. I think Dave is referring to the S-3 registration statements for the stock that Cornell Capital is getting, which may or may not actually be sold.
The story of MobilePro is whether a very financially sophisticated ex-investment banker can take this agglomeration of assets, including the largest live municipal Wi-Fi sites, and turn it into a real company. I still think he can. Uncertainty over the financing and future dilution has the stock under 10 cents a share, but I still think it is a strong buy. I would use these prices to average down, and I am keeping MOBL as a buy all the way up to 25 cents for a first target of 60 cents. If they can leverage their Wi-Fi networks into WiMAX networks, this is going to be a 10- or 20-bagger from current levels.


