Dear New World Investor:
Except it wasn’t “So-Crates”, as Bill and Ted called him. This quote was crafted by a student, Kenneth John Freeman, for his Cambridge dissertation published in 1907. Freeman did not claim that the passage under analysis was a direct quotation of anyone; instead, he was presenting his own summary of the complaints directed against young people in ancient times.
And pretty much ever since. Lately, the big complaints seem to be variations on “they’re always on their phones.” Yes, they are and will be for the next 100 years or so. One favorite variation is “social media is destroying them” in various ways, from Instagram showing girls impossible-to-match standards of beauty to boys scrolling for nekkid ladies. Older authorities assure us that only they can protect the younger generation, so they need the power to force Google, Facebook, TikTok, Twitter (now X), and everyone else to toe the authorities’ line.
In this environment, wouldn’t it be smart for a social media CEO to say his company is definitely not social media? It’s really about connecting family and friends in a positive, uplifting way? Especially if it started as a way to sext with a smaller chance of your dick pic or boob shot coming back to haunt you 10 years later? Welcome to Snap (SNAP).
Snap bills itself as a camera company, but what they really offer is an image- and video-based social media experience. They were founded in 2010 as Snapchat, a visual messaging app that has evolved to offer various choices such as Camera, Visual Messaging, Snap Map, Stories, and Spotlight that enable people to communicate visually for free through short videos and images. They also have a popular subscription service, Snapchat+ with over 11 million members, that offers extra functions.
The “camera company” link is Spectacles, an eyewear product that connects with Snapchat and captures photos and video from a human perspective. While they make some money from Spectacles, our interest is in their advertising products, including regular and AR ads, dynamic ads, story ads, and commercials.
Snap has a loyal and somewhat different demographic from Meta’s Instagram, which essentially copied their idea. The company is smaller than Meta and spends much less on R&D, but they can copy what Zuckerberg does in monetizing their user base with advertising. It’s important to understand that Meta and Snap do not sell their customer lists. Advertisers create ads and tell Snap what demographic characteristics might be interested in them. Snap then runs AI models to leverage their users’ history and show the ad to people most likely to respond. The better the match, the higher the advertisers’ return on investment, and the more likely they are to increase their ad budget with Snap.
Since I recommended Meta in April 2018 at $159.34, the stock has way more than tripled. As you can see below, SNAP is selling near its lows.
But is it cheap? Snap has about an $18 billion market capitalization and trades for 8.4x book value (which includes $3.1 billion in cash), 3.5x sales per share, and 27.9x the 2025 average consensus earnings estimate of 37¢ per share. That doesn’t look especially cheap on the surface, although it’s not out of line for a big technology company today.
But let’s look under the hood. Revenues are growing around 15% a year and I think that rate will accelerate over the next few years. That average 2025 earnings estimate of 37¢ is in a huge range from 23¢ to 64¢, and analysts have consistently underestimated SNAP.
The range for September quarter earnings, to be announced on October 29, is ridiculously large at 3¢ to 9¢. Revenues will be up about 34% to $1.36 billion. Average revenue per user (ARPU) was $2.86 in the June quarter, up from $2.69 in last year’s period, and Snap’s AI targeting is just kicking in. The company had 432 million daily active users and 850 million monthly active users in the June quarter. I expect they added 10 million or so in the September quarter. Advertisers are starting to pay attention:
Their adjusted gross profit margin has been stable and the 2023 increase in infrastructure costs is behind them.
Snap has served more than 75% of 13- to 34-year-olds in over 25 countries. Today, approximately 80% of Snapchatters are above the age of 18. In the June quarter, global content viewers grew 12% year-over-year, and global time spent watching content grew 25% year-over-year and 10% quarter-over-quarter. Monetizing that is Snap’s opportunity to continue to beat Wall Street estimates and attract Buy recommendations. That is why I want you to Buy SNAP under $11 for an $18+ target.
* * * * *
This morning’s Consumer Price Index report showed year-over-year headline inflation softened slightly in September, down to 2.4% from 2.5% in August. It was the lowest annual headline reading since February 2021, but a tick above the 2.3% consensus expectation. So Wall Street traders pretended “inflation came in hot” and took stocks down early on to shake out some retail holders.
The monthly headline number was up 0.2%, the same as August, but also a tick above the 0.1% expectation.
Shelter rose 4.9% from last year, much less than August’s 5.2% increase as the lagging rent index slowly catches up with the real world. Shelter rose 0.2% month-over-month after rising 0.5% in August. Shelter, along with the food index that rose 0.4% month-over-month in September, contributed to over 75% of the monthly increase in overall inflation.
The far more relevant (to the Fed, not to your pocketbook) core CPI was up 3.3% year-over-year versus 3.2% in August. It rose 0.3% month-over-month, the same as August but yet another tick higher than the 0.2% expectation. According to the CME FedWatch tool, no one expects a 50 basis point cut at the Fed’s November 7 announcement. 89% of interest rate traders expect a 25bps cut and 11% expect no cut.
The “no cut” group thinks last Friday’s “strong” monthly payrolls report – who knows what the real numbers were, especially in an election year – put the kibosh on a 50 basis point (50bps or ½ of one percentage point) increase in the Fed funds rate at the November 7 meeting. As I’ve been saying, look for 25bps in November and another 25bps on December 18.
The payrolls report showed 254,000 added jobs in September, clobbering the 150,000 consensus estimate. The unemployment rate fell to 4.1% from 4.2% in August. August payroll additions were were revised up from 142,000 to 159,000.
Click for larger graphic h/t Yahoo Finance
One increasing problem with the monthly report is that just 62% of the businesses polled responded on time to be included, the lowest response rate in 14 years. That was down from 68% last September, and 77% in the average September since 2010.
Click for larger graphic h/t @PantheonMacro
Of course, we won’t know the real number for about nine months, when the Business Employment Dynamics report comes out. By then, no one will care. FWIW, ADP’s National Employment Report for August showed private payrolls in the US added just 99,000 jobs during the month, well below economists’ estimates for 145,000 and fewer than the 122,000 jobs added in July. The August data marked the fifth straight month payroll additions slowed from the month prior. Meanwhile, the Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data this week showed July ended with the lowest amount of job openings in the US labor market since January 2021.
Wage growth rose to 3.8% year-over-year, up from a 3.6% annual gain in August. On a monthly basis, wages increased 0.4%, higher than the 0.2% seen the month prior. As I wrote last week, this will not bother the Fed because Fed Chairman Powell has said that the labor market is NOT a source of inflationary pressure. His simplified wage cost push inflation model – wage growth less productivity equals inflation – taken with positive comments he made about productivity growth, suggests the Fed is comfortable with 4% wage growth due to an increase in productivity growth from ~1.5% to 2%.
The factor that bothered me most from this report is that the number of government workers exploded higher, which meant the difference between a 4.1% and 4.5% unemployment rate.
Click for larger graphic h/t Andrew Zatlin
This morning’s report showing jobless claims surged to their highest level since August 2023 tells you what is really going on in the private sector. Part of this is from Hurricane Helene and the Boeing strike. but some unimpacted states also saw large increases. On balance, expect 25bps on November 7 and another 25bps on December 18
Stocks are riding a host of tailwinds into the final months of the year, including the Fed’s dovish pivot on rate cuts in late August and the surprise unveiling of billions in new fiscal stimulus from China. The S&P 500, which ended the third quarter at an all-time closing high, has risen for each of the past five weeks and eight of the past nine, taking its year-to-date gain to 21.2% as of today.
Stocks are likely to get further support from the third quarter earnings reports as well as expanding corporate profits over the final three months of the year and beyond as the economy continues to outperform forecasts. S&P 500 September quarter earnings are forecast to grow 5% from last year to around $5.11 billion. December quarter profits are expected to rise 12.5%.
We are deep into the stock buyback blackout period that starts unwinding in a major way at the end of October, pushing stocks higher in November and December.
Click for larger graphic h/t @themarketear
The S&P 500 typically sells off by 4% to 5% about a month going into election day and then rallies to year end on a clear resolution. I’m not so sure we’ll have a clear resolution this time because whichever party loses has already lawyered up to challenge the results of a close election. The market sure didn’t like the 2000 Bush-Gore debacle.
Click for larger graphic h/t Deutsche Bank
Goldman Sachs trimmed their 2024 earnings growth forecast to 8.2% from 8.4% but still sees momentum building into next year. They boosted their 2025 profit growth forecast by five percentage points to a full-year gain of 11%. They wrote: “The upward revision to our 2025 EPS estimate is greater margin expansion.” They expect the S&P 500 to hit 6000 this year and then rise another 300 points to a 2025 year-end target of 6300.
Market Outlook
This bull market started on October 12, 2022. It’s about to turn two years old, but that’s young for a bull market – even for ones that start in October. This bull market is up 61%, compared with the average bull market lasting 5½ years and gaining 181%. It could end soon, but many more years of gains would be perfectly normal.
Click for larger graphic h/t @ryandetrick
The S&P 500 added 1.4% since last Thursday. The Index is up 21.2% year-to-date and is having its best year since 1997.
Click for larger graphic h/t @LanceRoberts
This is the first time in the 21st century the S&P 500 has returned at least 20% through the first three quarters of the year. History says that momentum could carry the index higher in the December quarter. Since its inception in March 1957, the Index has returned at least 20% through the third quarter of the year just seven times. In those years, the S&P had a median return of 31% for the full year. In order to return 31% in 2024, it would reach 6249 by December 31. That implies 8.1% upside in the remaining weeks of the fourth quarter – well above Wall Street’s expectations. It’s not likely, but possible.
The Nasdaq Composite gained 2.0% and is up 21.8% for the year. Nasdaq 100 (NDX) seasonality is very strong from here, so the real pain trade is up.
Click for larger graphic h/t @themarketear
The SPDR S&P Biotech Exchange-Traded Fund (XBI) fell 0.5% as investors continue to avoid biotech. It is up only 7.7% year-to-date. The small-cap Russell 2000 added a measly 0/3% and is up only 7.9% in 2024.
The fractal dimension is doing a good job of consolidating the summer rally, but it still has a long way to go. Election uncertainty is our friend here, as is the Fed not running the money printer in panic mode. There are still a few weeks to go to hit the fully consolidated 55 level.
Top 5
Changes this week: None
Near-Term – chronological order
SCYX – ScyNexis – Data releases and resolution of the manufacturing problem
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP – crude should rise quickly
EQT EQT –natural gas price rebound
CMPS – Compass Pathways – Rebound from negative AdCom review of MDMA and Phase 3 data release in December quarter
FCX Freeport McMoRan – copper shortage
AKBA Akebia Therapeutics – Vafseo TDAPA approval in January
Long-Term – alphabetical order
ABCL AbCelllera – Will become a huge pharma royalty company
UUUU Energy Focus – Domestic uranium supplier
EQT EQT – largest US natural gas company
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust – Bitcoin is headed for $100,000
META Meta – a (the?) leader in the metaverse
PLTR Palantir – a (the?) leader in AI applications software
RKLB Rocket Lab – #2 to SpaceX in space
SCYX ScyNexis –First new antifungal in 20 years
Economy
The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model for September quarter growth has climbed to 3.2%, well over the Blue Chip consensus for 1.9% and the general Wall Street expectation for 2.5%. Will we see a surprisingly strong GDP report to help Kamala to victory?
Coming Events
All times below are ET, and most presentations and slides are archived on the companies’ websites so you can listen to them. It’s ScyNexis Week!
Thursday, October 17
SCYX – ScyNexis – 11:30am – Maxim Healthcare Virtual Summit
SCYX – ScyNexis – 1:45pm – IDWeek
Friday, October 18
SCYX – ScyNexis – 3:15pm – Poster presentation at IDWeek
Big Tech: The Biotech & Digital Dominators MegaShift
There are at least four ways to make money in the stocks of these large, growing, dominant companies. You can:
* * Buy a stock and hold it
* * Buy a stock and write a call option against it
* * With a Level IV options account, write an out-of-the-money put option
* * With a Level IV options account, write an out-of-the-money put option and use part of the premium to buy an out-of-the-money call option
Apple (AAPL – $229.04) iPhone 16 Pro demand has generally met expectations so far, but that of the iPhone base model and 16 Plus remain lackluster compared to last year, according to TF International Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.
Apple is reportedly set to unveil its first Apple Intelligence features later this month, with the launch of its new iOS 18.1 operating system on October 28. That would give first access to iPhone 16, iPhone 15, and iPhone 15 Pro users who update their software. I expect it to ignite an upgrade cycle for the holiday season.
Ming-Chi Kuo also said Apple appears poised to unveil a new version of the Vision Pro mixed reality headset next year, with mass production in the second half of 2025. It will be powered by Apple’s M5 chip to create a better Apple Intelligence user experience, Kuo wrote: “In particular, if the M5 Vision Pro can integrate something like Open AI’s Sora [Sora is Open AI’s text-to-video generator], it may elevate the user experience of the head-mounted display device to unimaginable levels. The impact of text-to-video AI models in the head-mounted display device experience will likely be more impressive than exists in existing mainstream consumer devices.”
The current Vision Pro uses Apple’s less powerful M2 processor, which was introduced in June 2022. It also has the R1 coprocessor that is used for real-time input processing. Aside from the chip and Apple Intelligence, Kuo said other hardware specs and designs in the Vision Pro “won’t change much, which should help lower costs and price points.”
According to Bloomberg, Apple will unveil a new entry-level iPhone SE in 2025. It will be based on the iPhone 14 and will support Apple Intelligence. The current iPhone SE is based on the design of the iPhone 8. There will also be new iPad Air models. Finally, Apple is planning to introduce new Macs this month. AAPL is a HOLD – expect to move back to Buy under $175 for new iPhones.
Gilead Sciences (GILD – $84.67) was upgraded to Overweight by Wells Fargo based on the upcoming HIV prevention drug launch. They believe the PrEP launch could “propel GILD’s next phase of growth.” Wells estimates the PrEP opportunity at more than $5 billion in sales by 2030 compared to the consensus estimate of $2 billion. GILD is a Long-Term Buy under $80 for a first target of $120.
Meta Platforms (META – $583.83) held their Meta Connect 2024 conference in late September. I’ve been thinking about some of the longer-term implications of what they showed. I think they’re making a shift towards AR (augmented reality) over VR (virtual reality) and the metaverse, at least for now. They showed a cheap $300 Meta Quest 3S VR headset for cost-conscious consumers that still provides a comprehensive VR experience.
They also showed impressive AI translation services, demonstrating this with two-time UFC champion Brandon Moreno. They’re able to change the way a person’s lips move to fit the language of the translation while maintaining the initial speaker’s tone. This will become more comprehensive over time and make it much easier to develop global connections without severe language barriers. Meta is likely to lead the commercial development of this technology.
As the demo with Brandon Moreno showed, Meta seems to be moving towards a celebrity endorsement and luxury marketing effort. Zuckerberg seems to want to take the company away from its status as a social media company towards an integrated physical/virtual technology company with social media as its foundation. We see this in its new Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses with AI chatbot capabilities that sold out faster than anticipated and actually had supply issues due to the high demand. Meta also introduced Orion, their first true AR glasses that combine holographic displays and new electromyography technology for hands-free interaction. (Electromyography is a technique for evaluating and recording the electrical activity produced by skeletal muscles.) As Meta develops this market, they could create a moat similar to, although smaller than, the iPhone.
My experience is that virtual connection like Zoom meetings is no substitute for physical reality. If Meta continues to focus on their smart glasses and AR glasses technologies that enhance physical interactions instead of replacing them, while continuing to be one of the top investors in AI, I’m going to have to raise my buy limit.
Piper Sandler released their 48th semi-annual Taking Stock With Teens survey that took in more than 63 million data points to summarize teen preferences and spending trends. TikTok was reported as the favorite social app among teens, while Meta’s Instagram came in second and Snapchat ranked third.
KeyBanc Capital Markets raised their target price by $105 from $550 to $655 per share, saying: “Our checks indicate that the ad market remained solid in Q3, and favorable currency movements suggest potential upside to Wall Street revenue and profitability forecasts. Additionally, we believe product cycles at Meta are likely to sustain solid growth into 2025. Big picture, we believe progress in Facebook Reality Labs and AI are causing more investors to look through operating losses and assign a higher P/E multiple.”
Cantor Fitzgerald raised their target price by $10 to $670, saying September quarter revenue gains will likely impress despite “…lingering discomfort on return on invested capital of AI investments. We think Meta has plenty of runway in ongoing contributors (A+, Reels, recommendations) to revenue growth in fiscal 2025 and the impact of generative-AI investments could increasingly emerge over the next 12-18 months. We expect the depth of engagement to improve as use cases expand and Meta merchandises Meta AI increasingly into various products and services.”
META is a Hold – I still expect to move back to Buy, but probably well over $400.
Palantir (PLTR – $43.52) has only five Buy ratings from the 20 analysts who cover the stock, with the remainder split between Hold and Sell. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives raised his target price from $38 to $45 while keeping an Outperform rating. He said that he is “more bullish” on Palantir going forward, noting that his recent channel checks indicated incrementally more enterprises are strategically discussing how they will deploy the company’s Artificial Intelligence Platform during 2025. He said the increased price target reflects higher confidence in Palantir’s enterprise-driven artificial intelligence strategy. He added that he views this as a clear “game changer” for the Palantir story as the use cases of AI start to take hold over the next 12 to 18 months. The company is “in a prime spot to continue expanding its pipeline/deal flow while providing more use cases coming forward to address critical problems across industries.”
The Street‘s Stephen Guilfoyle said: “We have not had a precise target since the $36 level had been taken and held.” That’s changed. He unveiled a new $48 target on Palantir this week.
He pointed out that Palantir will report September-quarter results in November, and analysts are looking for adjusted earnings of nine cents per share on revenue of $703.7 million. He wrote: “If this is indeed the way the cookie crumbles, those numbers would be good for earnings growth of 29% on revenue growth of 26%. Of the 11 sell-side analysts I see that post sales estimates for Palantir, all 11 have increased their estimates since the start of the third quarter.”
PLTR is a Buy under $22 for a $100+ target.
SoftBank (SFTBY – $30.36) bought back another 3,314,700 shares of its stock between September 2 and September 20. CEO Masayoshi Son is going to squeeze everyone out of the stock but us until it gets to a substantial premium to hard net asset value from today’s 50% discount. SFTBY is a Buy under $25 for a first target of $50 in the next two years.
Small Tech
Fastly (FSLY – $7.24) slipped after Raymond James downgraded the stock from Strong Buy to Market Perform, although they kept their $8 target price. They wrote: “Fastly has been resetting the business over the course of the year, and has expanded its product offerings as well. We believe these can get traction as the company sorts through the cost-cutting at media/streaming companies that impacted results in 2024, as well as the outlook over the next 12 months. That said, it may take a few more quarters for all the new efforts to show improved top line and FCF results, making a less aggressive rating more appropriate.”
I believe Fastly’s investments will pay off much faster than that as we are in an environment that rewards companies to move quickly to improve service and lower costs. FSLY is a Buy up to $10 for a 3- to 5-year hold to $80+ as Compute@Edge drives customer acquisition and revenue growth.
Primary Risk:Content and applications delivery networks are a competitive area.
PagerDuty (PD – $18.12) introduced enterprise-grade, AI-powered innovations to future-proof operations and improve the business results of their customers. These features help operations teams to automate their processes and reduce time spent at every stage of the incident management lifecycle. This will protect their company’s customer experience and mitigate the risk of operational failure while replacing point solutions.
The new features use automation and machine learning to help teams predict the scope of impact and drive action to resolve issues before they become outages. This is a big deal for PagerDuty’s revenue growth and market share.
* * PagerDuty Advance Assistant for Microsoft Teams adds generative AI capabilities to Microsoft Teams to help customers work where they are. PagerDuty Advance provides helpful insight at every step of the incident lifecycle, generating summaries and triage support for faster resolution. Teams can work smarter with AI-powered contextual support from chat in order to respond and recover faster.
* * Automation on Alerts helps reduce the total incident count, easing the load on resource-strapped teams and giving them time back to focus on value-add work. Operations teams can configure automation to be triggered at the alert level, helping teams catch issues before they escalate into incidents.
* * Global Intelligent Alert Grouping accelerates incident resolution, freeing up time and resources to build better experiences. PagerDuty’s AI models now offer greater precision by using enhanced pattern recognition to work across services to help teams separate signal from noise.
* * Unified Chat Experience and Incident Types Power Guided Remediation combined with PagerDuty Advance generative AI capabilities, lets teams manage an incident from start to finish using dynamic commands to collaborate directly from where they work. Users will be able to reclassify incident types, trigger incident workflows, establish tasks and roles, and reassign incidents across services, without leaving Microsoft Teams or Slack.
With the PagerDuty Advance chat experience, it is estimated that customers can save approximately $490,000 for every 10 engineers responding to an incident. The company cited a global payments processing customer utilizing PagerDuty Advance who has realized significant efficiency gains, reducing four days of manual work each month, and averting 45 minutes of disruption during each major incident. This optimization translates into millions of dollars in monthly savings. PD is a Buy up to $30 for a 2- to 5-year hold as their digital operations management Software-As-A-Service gains market share.
Primary Risk: Digital operations management is a competitive area.
Rocket Lab USA (RKLB – $9.39) won a NASA contract to complete a study for retrieving rock samples from the Martian surface and bringing them to Earth for the first time. The study will explore “a simplified end-to-end mission concept that will be delivered for a fraction of the current projected program cost and completed several years earlier than the current expected sample return date in 2040.”
RKLB is a Buy up to $13 for my $30+ target as low earth orbit satellites and space exploration grow.
Primary Risk: A new competitor emerges.
Biotech MegaShift
If you can afford it – and it would not be too big a position in your portfolio – putting $2,000 into each of these speculative biotechs might be a good way to start. Buying these out-of-favor, fallen, or forgotten companies that can get important products through the FDA at very low market capitalizations seems like a good strategy to me.
Risks
Development-stage biotechs are subject to investor sentiment swings from wildly optimistic to excessively pessimistic – mostly the latter recently. After the Primary Risk for each company, I’ve added the clinical stage of their lead product, the probable time of their first FDA approval, and the probable time of their next financing.
As always, you need to think about an appropriate position size. You could buy a full position upfront and then just hold on, or buy some upfront and leave room to add more on the inevitable financings, transient clinical trial setbacks, and the like.
AbCellera Biologics (ABCL- $2.50) announced an upcoming poster presentation on its T-cell engager platform at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) annual meeting on November 8. I have not written much about this relatively early-stage program, but it could turn into a very big deal. More coming. Buy ABCL up to $6 for a long-term hold to $30 or more.
Primary Risk: Partnered and owned drugs fail in the clinic.
Clinical stage of lead product: Partnered: Various Owned: Preclinical
Probable time of next FDA approval: 2027-2028
Probable time of next financing: 2026-2027 or never
Akebia Therapeutics (AKBA- $1.28) announced a multi-year commercial supply contract encompassing all US Renal Care dialysis centers, a major provider of in-center and home dialysis. The contract enables USRC’s nearly 2,000 attending physicians to prescribe Vafseo for patients on dialysis as deemed clinically appropriate when it is expected to be available in January 2025. USRC will create the necessary protocol before then.
Speaking of which, in what must be near-record time the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services has determined that Vafseo meets the criteria for the Transitional Drug Add-On Payment Adjustment (TDAPA) in the anemia management end-stage renal disease (ESRD) prospective payment system functional category, beginning on January 1.
Additionally, Akebia received a Level II Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code for Vafseo which will be used for billing for the product by dialysis organizations for Medicare enrollees. Within the next several weeks, CMS is expected to issue a Medicare Claims Processing Change Request that will give further billing guidance to dialysis organizations to obtain the separate TDAPA payment for the next two years under Medicare.
With TDAPA approval, the sales force can put the pedal to the metal in closing contracts, which has to happen before centers create a protocol, which has to happen before their doctors can prescribe Vafseo. At the same time, they are calling on doctors to build up demand for a rapid launch in less than 90 days. Buy AKBA up to $2 for the vadadustat launches in the EU, UK, and US.
Primary Risk: Vadadustat doesn’t sell in the US.
Clinical stage of lead product: Approved
Probable time of next approval: NM
Probable time of next financing: Never
Editas Medicine (EDIT – $2.96) sold a portion of their future license fees and other payments under their Cas9 license agreement with Vertex Pharmaceuticals to DRI Healthcare Trust for an upfront cash payment of $57 million. That is immediate non-dilutive capital to fund further pipeline development and related strategic priorities. With 100 more genomic medicine programs advancing at 10 major companies, expect to see a lot more non-dilutive financing over the next few years.
In this deal, Editas sold up to 100% of certain future annual license fees, ranging from $5 million to $40 million per year and a mid-double-digit percentage of Editas Medicine’s portion of a $50 million contingent upfront payment. In addition to their portion of any such contingent upfront payment, Editas retains rights to fixed annual license fees for 2024 and a mid-single-digit million-dollar payment due to Editas if Vertex achieves certain annual sales milestones. EDIT is a Buy under $6 for a double in 12 months and a long-term hold to much higher prices.
Primary Risk: Other companies’ gene-sequencing drugs fail in the clinic.
Clinical stage of lead product: Partnered: Approved; Owned: Preclinical.
Probable time of next FDA approval: 2026
Probable time of next financing: 2026 or never
Inovio (INO – $5.41) has been weak since they announced that the Biologics Licensing Application (BLA) filing for INO-3107 has been delayed to mid-2025 due to manufacturing issues with the CELLECTRA delivery device. They had $110.4 million in cash at the end of June, which gives them a cash runway into the September 2025 quarter. But companies rarely run their cash under a six-month runway. I expect the company to either resolve the CELLECTRA issue and file the BLA in the March 2025 quarter or do a stock offering then. INO is a Buy under $14 for a very long-term hold.
Primary Risk: Their drugs fail in the clinic.
Clinical stage of lead product: Phase 3
Probable time of first FDA approval: Early 2026
Probable time of next financing: March 2025 or after FDA approval in 2026
Medicenna (MDNAF – $1.59) will present three posters at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) annual meeting. They will present updated clinical data from the ongoing Phase 1/2 ABILITY-1 Study evaluating MDNA11 as both a monotherapy and in combination with Keytruda in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The third poster will cover new pre-clinical data on MDNA113, a novel first-in-class, masked, tumor-targeted bifunctional anti-PD1-IL-2 Superkine. MDNA55, Medicenna’s IL-2 agonist in glioblastoma, will also be presented at the conference. Buy MDNAF under $3 for a first target of $20, then maybe $40.
Primary Risk: Their drugs fail in the clinic.
Clinical stage of lead product: Entering Phase 3
Probable time of first FDA approval: 2025
Probable time of next financing: 2025
ScyNexis (SCYX – $1.52) uploaded a new corporate presentation that says (slide 3): “We anticipate filing our request with the FDA in Q4 of 2024 to lift the MARIO study clinical hold.” I expect the stock to move up when they announce the filing, again when the FDA lifts the hold, some more when they dose the first new patient, and even more when they start collecting milestone payments from GSK.
The company will make oral and poster presentations on SCY-247 next Thursday and Friday at the Infectious Diseases Week (IDWeek) conference. Buy SCYX under $2.50 for a first target price of $20 after ibrexafungerp is approved for hospital use and a buyout at $50.
Primary Risk: Ibrexafungerp fails to sell.
Clinical stage of lead product: Approved
Probable time of next FDA approval: 2025
Probable time of next financing: Never
Inflation MegaShift
Gold ($2,648.60) fell $24.60 on Tuesday, putting in the biggest down candle in a while. It was nothing huge, but worth watching, especially as gold is such a darling these days. The short-term trend channel remains in place, with big support at $2,600. The 50-day moving average is down at $2,533.
The last time the 10-year Treasury note traded this high, gold was about $175 lower. This chart shows gold versus the 10-year inverted.
Click for larger graphic h/t @themarketear
The dollar does matter. The last time the dollar was this strong, gold traded close to $2,500. This chart shows gold versus the dollar (DXY) inverted.
Click for larger graphic h/t @themarketear
Momentum in gold remains powerful, but we are not alone in being bullish on gold here. This chart shows CFTC net long minus short position in futures for the Managed Money category.
Click for larger graphic h/t @themarketear
A sell-off would trigger Commodity Trading Advisers into selling their big gold long.
UBS upgraded their already bullish view on gold to much higher than consensus expectations: “We lift our gold price targets, moving them to our previous upside scenario – we now expect the market to rally towards $2,800 by year-end and to $3,000 in 2025. Gold’s rally this year has been driven by a combination of factors – broad-based buying across the different parts of the market combined with a lack of sellers. We expect these trends to continue.”
Over the past 10 years, since the Great Financial Crisis and our government’s decision to sacrifice the dollar to bail out the banks – and all of the bailouts that have followed – the price of gold has gone from around $700 per ounce to $2,648 today. That’s a 264% increase. Priced in gold, the S&P 500 is actually down since the first of the big Wall Street bailouts, the September 1998 financial rescue of Long-Term Capital Management. At that time, the S&P 500 was worth 3.5 ounces of gold. Today, it’s worth only 2.2 ounces. Funny what happens when you destroy your economy by printing money.
The fractal dimension did a picture-perfect turn right at the fully exhausted 30 level and now should consolidate for a few weeks under the weight of a stronger dollar to get back up to 55. The yellow metal isn’t usually this well-behaved, though.
Miners & Related
Coeur Mining (CDE – $6.40) is acquiring Canadian miner SilverCrest Metals for $1.7 billion in stock. On the conference call (AUDIO HERE and SLIDES HERE), management said SilverCrest’s high-grade Las Chispas mine in Mexico is a low-cost, high-margin producer that sold around 10.25 million silver equivalent ounces in 2023 at an average cash cost of $7.73 an ounce. The combined companies will produce around 21 million ounces of silver and 432,000 ounces of gold in 2025. SilverCrest has substantial exploration potential, and we know Coeur is good at that.
Financially, the SilverCrest acquisition will significantly boost Coeur’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) from $521 million to $702 million and free cash flow from $272 million to $361 million in 2025. CEO Mitch Krebs said: “The acquisition of SilverCrest creates a leading global silver company by adding low-cost silver and gold production and significant free cash flow to our rapidly growing production and cash flow driven by the recent expansion of our Rochester silver and gold mine in Nevada. Together with SilverCrest’s large and growing cash balance and no debt, our balance sheet is expected to be materially strengthened on day one.”
Cash goes from $74 million to $196 million. This will accelerate Coeur’s reduction of their remaining $629 million of debt. Coeur owns 67% of the combined company. There will be a shareholder vote around yearend and the deal will close in the March quarter. SilverCrest management did this because they think Coeur stock is cheap. They’re right. Others like the deal: The Coeur/SilverCrest Merger Has My Blessing. CDE is a Buy under $5 for a $20 target as gold goes higher.
Primary Risk: Prices of precious metals fall due to US dollar strength.
Sandstorm Gold (SAND – $5.83) sold 17,350 attributable gold equivalent ounces in the September quarter and realized preliminary revenue of $44.7 million. That compares to 21,123 attributable gold equivalent ounces and $41.3 million in revenue in last year’s period. Preliminary cost of sales excluding depletion was $5.3 million, resulting in cash operating margins of approximately $2,215 per attributable gold equivalent ounce. That compares to $4.7 million and $1,699 per attributable gold equivalent ounce last year. They’ll hold their conference call on November 8. SAND is a Buy under $10 for a $25 target.
Primary Risk: Prices of precious metals fall due to US dollar strength.
Cryptocurrencies
Cryptocurrencies are a diversifying asset that offer a unique opportunity to make (or lose!) a lot of money quickly. You can easily buy bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies at Coinbase, Block, or Robinhood.
Bitcoin (BTC-USD on Yahoo – $59,594.91) has been hit harder than gold by increasing long-term interest rates and the stronger dollar. Today’s dip under $60,000 probably is transient.
FWIW veteran cryptocurrency analyst Bob Loukas trades a four-year cycle of bitcoin. He says that bitcoin is close to the third year—a point in time when explosive growth normally takes place. He wrote: “Bitcoin closes the second year of its four-year cycle next month, entering the third and historically explosive year of the cycle.”
He said that since the $73,835 record high on March 14, “An eight-month base has been built, sentiment reset, and rates are easing. I mean, the script is perfect,” adding that a combination of flipping investor sentiment and likely interest rate cuts could trigger a parabolic uptrend. He’s looking for $150,000.
BTC-USD, ETH-USD, IBIT, and ETHA are Strong Buys.
Primary Risk: Bitcoin falls due to over-regulation or is surpassed by another cryptocurrency.
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT- $33.95) remains the cheapest and easiest way to buy bitcoin. IBIT is a Buy for the 2028, 2032, and 2036 halvings.
Primary Risk:Bitcoin falls due to over-regulation or is surpassed by another cryptocurrency.
iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA- $17.91) remains the cheapest and easiest way to buy ethereum. ETHA is a Buy.
Primary Risk:Ethereum falls due to over-regulation or is surpassed by another cryptocurrency.
Commodities
Oil – $75.42
Oil touched $77 on Monday and held most of it for the week. Gasoline storage had another huge draw of 6.304 million barrels because so many Gulf refineries are closed.
Click for larger graphic h/t @HFI_Research
It’s very clear that US shale oil production is getting gassier and gassier, which means shale oil production will keep declining. At the same time, US implied oil demand (4-week average) is going from “decent” to “good.”
Click for larger graphic h/t @HFI_Research
When the rubber band that is the current low price of paper oil snaps back, it will be fast and furious. Got oil?
The July 2026 Crude Oil Futures (CLN26.NYM – $68.19) are a Buy under $70 for a $200+ target. Only buy futures for all cash; do not use margin.
The United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (USL – $39.15) is a Buy under $40 for a $100+ target.
Vermilion Energy (VET – $10.09) is a Buy under $11 for a target price of $24 or more.
Primary Risk: Oil prices fall.
EQT (EQT – $36.62) will provide much of the natural gas that will be burned to generate electricity for AI applications and electric vehicles. The US really doesn’t have large natural gas-fired utilities yet, but they’re coming. The five biggest natural gas power plants in the world today are:
#1 – Surgutskaya GRES-2, Russia – 5,597 megawatts (MW)
At 5,597MW installed capacity, Surgutskaya GRES-2 (Sugrut-2), a combined cycle power plant located in the Russian city of Surgut, is the world’s biggest gas-fired power station. The facility is owned and operated by E.ON Russia. It consists of six 800MW units commissioned between 1985 and 1988, and two advanced gas-fired combined cycle units with a combined capacity of 797.1MW commissioned in July 2011. The latest units added to the power station are based on GE 9FA gas turbines and have an efficiency rate of 55.9%.
Surgutskaya GRES-2 consumes approximately 10 billion cubic meters of gas annually, which mostly comes from the oilfields in the Tyumen Region of Russia. The power plant generated 39.85 billion kilowatts of electricity in 2013.
#2 – Futtsu LNG thermal power station, Japan – 5,040MW
The 5,040MW Futtsu liquefied natural gas (LNG)-based thermal power station located in Chiba, Japan, is owned and operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). It consists of four combined cycle power plants commissioned between 1985 and 2010.
The first two plants, with 1,000MW installed capacity each, were commissioned in 1986 and 1988. They are comprised of 14 combined cycle units based on GE’s 9E gas turbines. The third plant, Futtsu-3, comprising four 380MW GE 109FA+e combined cycle systems with 55.3% design thermal efficiency, was commissioned in 2003. The 1,520MW Futtsu-4 was commissioned between 2008 and 2010, and consists of three GE 109H combined cycle systems with 58.6% design thermal efficiency.
The LNG fuel for the Futtsu thermal power plant is supplied through an underwater pipeline from the nearby Futtsu LNG terminal, which has the capacity to handle nine million tonnes of LNG per annum.
#3 – Kawagoe power station, Japan – 4,802MW
Chubu Electric Power Company’s Kawagoe thermal power station located in Kawagoe, Mie, Japan, with 4,802MW installed capacity, ranks as the world’s third biggest gas-fired power station. The plant consists of four generating units, all running on LNG.
Kawagoe’s first two LNG-fired units of 700MW capacity each were commissioned in 1989 and 1990. The boilers and steam turbines for these units were provided by Mitsubishi and Toshiba respectively. The third and fourth LNG-based combined cycle generating units comprised of Hitachi’s MS7001FA gas turbines and Mitsubishi’s ‘F’ series gas turbines respectively were commissioned in 1996 and 1997.
The power station uses six LNG tanks with total storage capacity of 840,000 cubic meters. The last two tanks with 180,000 cubic meters capacity each were installed in March 2013.
#4 – Dah-Tarn (Tatan) power station, Taiwan – 4,384MW
The 4,384MW Dah-Tarn (Tatan) power plant located in Guanyin, Taoyuan, in Northern Taiwan is the world’s fourth biggest gas-fired power plant. The gas turbine combined cycle power station is owned and operated by Taiwan Power Company (Taipower).
The plant was developed in two stages between 2005 and 2009. Stage-1 consisted of two generating units based on three Mitsubishi M501F gas turbines each. Stage-2 involved three generating units based on two Mitsubishi M501G gas turbines each.
The plant uses natural gas supplied by Taiwan’s state-owned Chinese Petroleum Corporation (CPC) which committed in 2003 to supply gas to the power plant for 25 years.
#5 – Chita thermal power station, Japan – 3,996MW
At 3,996MW installed capacity, the Chita thermal power station located in Chita, Aichi, Japan, is the world’s fifth biggest natural gas power plant. The plant, which began operations in 1968, is owned and operated by Chubu Electric Power Company.
The Chita power station currently consists of six LNG-fired units, four of which operate in combined cycle mode. The first four units, which were commissioned between 1966 and 1974 and originally designed to generate power by burning heavy crude oil, were converted for LNG-based power generation in 1985. The fifth and sixth LNG-fired units that were commissioned in 1978 as well as the first and second units of the plant were converted into combined cycle operation between 1992 and 1996.
Wait until you see what the US builds over the next 10 years while being the world’s biggest LNG exporter! EQT is a buy under $35 for a first target of $70 and a long-term hold for much higher prices.
Primary Risk:Natural gas prices fall.
Energy Fuels (UUUU – $5.40) did a webcast on the transformative Base Resources acquisition (AUDIO HERE and SLIDES HERE and TRANSCRIPT HERE). CEO Mark Chalmers said this provides a reliable, massive source of rare earth minerals to be processed into advanced rare earth materials in the US.
Energy Fuels’ White Mesa Mill is the only facility in the USA able to process monazite and produce advanced REE materials. They have 40 years of experience processing uranium, and they’ve been the largest US producer of uranium over the last several years. They’ve accounted for about two-thirds of US production since 2017. They are ramping up uranium production to between 1.0 million and 1.5 million pounds per year by the end of 2024, with plans to increase that up to 2.0 million pounds per year. And a BIG shortage is coming:
Click for larger graphic h/t @MrChris_Timmins CEO of Pegasus Resources
UUUU is a buy under $8 for a $30 target.
Primary Risk: Uranium prices fall.
* * * * *
Your thinking you can ‘drill, baby, drill,’ but the rocks beneath us have a way of dictating their own terms Editor,
Michael Murphy CFA
Founding Editor
New World Investor
All Recommendations
Priced 10/10/24. Check out the complete Portfolio page HERE.
Buys
These are the stocks everyone needs to own because transformative events are happening over the next year or two, and I expect to hold them long-term.
Tech Dominators
Corning (GLW – $46.03) – Buy under $33, target price $60
Gilead Sciences (GILD – $84.67) – Buy under $80, target price $120
Palantir (PLTR – $43.52) – Buy under $22, target price $100+
PayPal (PYPL – $78.98) – Buy under $68, target price $136
Snap (SNAP – $10.66) – Buy under $11, target price $17+
SoftBank (SFTBY – $30.36) – Buy under $25, target price $50
Small Tech
Enovix (ENVX – $11.69) – Buy under $20; 4-year hold to $100+
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR – $62.12) – Buy under $60; 3- to 5-year hold
Fastly (FSLY – $7.24) – Buy under $14; 3- to 5-year hold to $80+
PagerDuty (PD – $18.12) – Buy under $30; 2- to 5-year hold
QuickLogic (QUIK – $8.94) – Buy under $10, target price $40
Rocket Lab (RKLB – $9.39) – Buy under $13, target price $30+
$20-for-$1 Biotech
AbCellera Biologics (ABCL – $2.50) – Buy under $6, target $30+
Akebia Biotherapeutics (AKBA – $1.28) – Buy under $2, target $20
Compass Pathways (CMPS – $6.05) – Buy under $20, hold a long time for a 10x return
Editas Medicines (EDIT – $2.96) – Buy under $6 for a double in 12 months and a long-term hold to much higher prices
Inovio (INO – $5.41) – Buy under $14, hold a long time
Medicenna (MDNAF – $1.59) – Buy under $3, first target $20, then maybe $40
ScyNexis (SCYX – $1.52) – Buy under $3, target price $20, then $50
TG Therapeutics (TGTX – $21.83) – Buy under $12 for buyout at $30+
Inflation
A Short-Sale or REO House – ($415,400) – Hold
Bag of Junk Silver – ($31.34) – hold through silver bull market
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM – $31.08) – Buy under $28, target price $50
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ – $37.61) – Buy under $39, target price $100
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF – $24.68) – Buy under $18, target price $30
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL – $36.30) – Buy under $30, target price $50
Coeur Mining (CDE – $6.40) – Buy under $5, target price $20
First Majestic Mining (AG – $6.58) – Buy under $11, next target price $23
Paramount Gold Nevada (PZG – $0.42) – Buy under $1, first target price $10
Sandstorm Gold (SAND – $5.83) – Buy under $10, target price $25
Sprott Inc. (SII – $44.58) – Buy under $40, target price $70
Cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin (BTC-USD – $59,594.91) – Buy
iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT – $33.95) – Buy
Ethereum (ETH-USD – $2,376.33) – Buy
iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA- $17.91) – Buy
Commodities
Crude Oil Futures – July 2026 (CLN26.NYM – $68.19) – Buy under $70; $200+ target
United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (USL – $39.15) – Buy under $40; $100+ target
Vermilion Energy (VET – $10.09) – Buy under $11; $24 target
EQT (EQT – $36.62) – Buy under $35; $70 first target
Energy Fuels (UUUU – $5.40) – Buy under $8; $30 target
Freeport McMoRan (FCX – $49.54) – Buy under $44; $65 target within two years
Holds
These are holds but not sells – yet. They could get moved back to one of the buy categories if their prices drop or outlook improves, or they could become sell recommendations in the future.
Apple Computer (AAPL – $229.04) – Expect to move back to Buy under $175 for new iPhones
Meta (META – $583.83) – Expect to move back to Buy under $400
Publisher: GwynRose LLC, 5348 Vegas Drive, Suite 868, Las Vegas, NV 89108
New World Investor does not act as a personal investment adviser or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment for any specific individual. The recommendations and analysis presented to members are for the exclusive use of members. Members should be aware that investment markets have inherent risks and there can be no guarantee of future profits. Likewise, past performance does not assure future results. Recommendations are subject to change at any time. Nothing in this presentation should be considered personalized investment advice. No communication to you by Michael Murphy or any of our employees or contractors should be deemed as personalized investment advice.
Copyright ©GwynRoseLLC 2024
1
2 (buckle my shoe)
MM–many years ago you recommended a digital ad company, I forgot the name. It failed. When I see pop ups, I X it out and run. How many people are like me or the opposite? The chart for SNAP looks OK for nimble traders only.
MM has repeatedly dismissed the dilution risks associated with the longer play companies like the bio-wrecks (NVTA, APTO, …) and others like Velo.
There are several reasons that I can think of at the moment as to why I’m very skeptical that EDIT can avoid dilutive financing in the short-term and possible into the mid-term:
Infrequency of EDIT deals: EDIT has only signed 3 significant deals since 2015:
Juno Therapeutics/Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS): The original deal was inked in May 2015 with Juno Therapeutics and has expended a couple times over the years. It also transitioned to BMS when BMS acquired Juno. It’s still active but there is $56.7M in deferred revenue associated with this deal as of year-end 2023, which represents money EDIT has already received as cash but hasn’t yet earned.Allergan Pharmaceuticals: a deal was agreed to in March 2017 and was terminated in 2020.Vertex Pharmaceuticals: This most recent deal happened in December 2023 and EDIT just sold off the majority of the future revenue from this deal for $57M, which almost exactly matches their Q2 cash burn of $57.5M.So that’s 3 deals in 10 years, one of which will financially contribute to EDIT in the future, one that will minimally contribute given the majority of future revenues have been sold off, and one that’s no longer valid.
Royalty payouts EDIT owes to others: Just as SCYX pays a portion of the revenue that they receive from GSK to Merck because they licensed their molecule from Merck, EDIT needs to make license payments to others related to each deal that they sign. These payments, at first glance, appear to be based more on cash receipts than revenues but they’re significant. There is a “Sublicense and license fees” line item under Research & Development in EDIT’s Income Statement that appears to capture these costs. For the period of 2015 through 2023, Revenues totaled $288M. Add the $69M in current and long-term Deferred Revenue balances at year-end 2023 to represent the cash received but not reflected in the Revenue line which equals $357M as an estimate of cash received since 2015. Sublicense and license fees total $138M over the same 2015-2023 period. So Sublicense and license fees paid to others represent 39% on average of the cash that EDIT receives. That is a hefty percentage of incoming cash that EDIT doesn’t get to keep!
Multi-year timeframes between deal upfront cash receipts & associate drugs entering the market: The deals so far seem to be structured to provide a significant upfront payment, some milestones payments in the $2.5M to $5M range and then significant royalties once a drug is approved and on the market. But the time frame between receiving the upfront cash at deal signing and getting a drug on the market can be a many years, during which there is little money rolling in. Most of the upfront cash payment that EDIT receives gets booked as deferred revenue that EDIT then earns over the span of the next several years. So a new deal provides an initial cash bump but then contributes very little for the next several years.
High & increasing burn rate: EDIT’s cash burn for the first two quarters of 2024 were both over $50M per quarter. Costs and cash burn have been trending upwards, shortening EDIT’s cash runway.
MM has mentioned several times that there are 10 major companies worldwide, that have over 100 programs in development, that will need to make deals with EDIT, which presents a compelling case for EDIT’s long-term future. However, given EDIT has signed only three deals in the past 10 years there seems to be no rush on the part of these companies to make licensing deals in the near-term.
Is EDIT suddenly going to make deals at a rate & magnitude that, net of royalty payments to others, would offset their current cash burn rate of roughly $50M per quarter before they need to do a capital raise?
Will EDIT sell off the future revenues to their one remaining deal that they can monetize (BMS) if they don’t sign any additional deals in the short-term?
If EDIT does need to do a capital raise, even if it’s only one for something small like $100M reflecting two quarter’s worth of current cash burn, that’s adding 33.3M new shares ($100M/$3) to the 82M shares currently outstanding, which is quite dilutive. And there is the potential for far more dilution than that.
As I mentioned in a prior note, EDIT’s cash & marketable securities balance is now below the $300M level where they usually refinance and that’s the case even after selling off the Vertex future revenues. Companies don’t wait until their cash balance gets below a couple quarter’s worth of runway, which would make mid-2025 the latest I’d expect a capital raise unless EDIT can sign some new deals.
There is a lot of future uncertainty surrounding EDIT’s ability to on board deals at a pace that will enable them to avoid dilution in the near-term. Far too much uncertainty and potential dilution risk for me to invest in EDIT at this point. Given EDIT continues to trade downwards and setting new all-time lows, the market doesn’t appear too keen on EDIT’s short-term prospects either.
We’ll see how things play out over the next year or so. MM now projects FDA approval for EDIT’s sickle cell drug in 2026 which will boost EDIT’s longer-term prospects.
Thanks. This is the kind of balanced analysis of financial facts and company progress that is missing from MM’s work. You acknowledge the upside if the sickle cell drug becomes successful, and at the same time are realistic about the stock risks based on continuing negative cash flow even considering getting deals. Assuming sickle cell drug approval in 2026, figure a few more years until that makes profits.
BTW, thanks for reminding me that SCYX licensed Brexa from Merck. Why would Merck give up a supposed blockbuster in return for modest license revenue? I don’t have much respect for the SCYX medical team based on poor treatment design. Sales for VVC have been mediocre, and now I realize that the financial structure is even more shaky than I thought.
Today I met a new young lady patient with recurrent VVC. It was caused by poor treatment from her gynecologist with repeated antibiotics for bacterial vaginosis and the repeated single dose fluconazole. Does she need Brexa? NO NO. What she needs is a doctor like me who sits down with her and tells her not to eat sweets which is the root cause of VVC. The medical system is composed of stupid doctors and bureaucrats with regulations about what drugs are standard of care for a condition, and other irrelevant mandates. No attention is paid to root causes. Insurance pays a pittance to cover only a few minutes of a doctor’s time. That is why all insurance, whether private or govt run is ineffective, and proper care can only be given when the patient pays out of pocket for a doctor to take the amount of time it takes to retrain the patient in a healthy lifestyle. You get what you pay for. No stupid AI to give cookie cutter info. It takes a personal relationship with a real doctor to do what is required for proper care.
You are absolutely right. Modern medicine in the US is horrible. I just got a statement from my HMO (Kaiser) . They charged my insurance $350. for one office visit. That lasted 15 minutes. (That’s $1400 an hour) Insanely expensive. And they are hell bent on giving you a prescription for drugs that don’t do anything for the cause of the problem. My lady friend has cancer and for the last year her doctors have been billing her and her insurance for numerous drugs. One drug has side effects that leads them to prescribe another drug and on and on. She now has fluid build up on her heart that the drugs have no effect on. Her doctor told her at her latest appointment that he couldn’t do anything more. He recommended that she make an appointment with the hospital and have a device implanted in her chest that will remove the fluid!! Is that fixing the cause?? OMG
I feel tearful about your lady friend. A no-brainer, cheap insurance policy to reduce cancer risks is vitamin D. For prevention, get the blood test vitamin D 25 hydroxy over 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L in Canada, EU). Therapeutically, Get the levels 80-100 ng/ml. Include Vitamin K2 in the form of MK 7 180 mcg/day to prevent too much calcium in the blood possibly from high dose vitamin D. I take that MK 7 from Orthomolecular Products. BTW, Orthomolecular sells the best quality fish oil which also reduces inflammation and cancer spread. This product is called Orthomega 820. The omega 3 is in the triglyceride form which has almost twice the bioavailability of most other fish oil products which are in the ester form. That includes the super pricey Lovaza inferior ester pharmaceutical version. The triglyceride form is the natural form from real food such as canned sardines in olive oil from Costco.
I know the eminent integrative internist MD, Dr. Ronald Hoffman in NYC. He vehemently disagrees with mainstream oncologists who forbid antioxidants concurrent with chemotherapy. The mainstream case is that to kill cancer, pro-oxidant effects are needed, but integrative MD’s say that antioxidants can be used at different times from when the chemotherapy is given. You can see how there is much acrimony between the two camps, like this election season.
There is no disagreement that omega 3 fish oil is helpful. Get on the email list of Orthomolecular News Service to learn more. It is a crime that Big Pharma teams up with left-wingers to censor this information. They want Big Pharma monopoly, but the best care is a judicious open-minded combination of both natural and drug approaches.
Just glanced at the site you recommended. Quite a collection of articles. I can’t wait to delve into several of them. Here’s the link for those interested.
https://orthomolecular.org/
Thank you so much, I will most certainly pass that information on to her. Very much appreciated.
Brent–on EDIT, does MM’s projected license fee income change your assessment that the company is in a long term death spiral with numerous dilutive financings needed?
I see I pasted the response under the wrong comment…:)
MM – whats yiur timeframe for the target on SNAP?
12 months
MM why EQT at a 1.68% which look like a stranded corp. and not ET at a 7.75% an Limited Partnership which in my opinion has tax advantages. I hold ET and have found it to be quite a good place to store $ i don’t think i have ever got less than %7.
why do you prefer EQT with such a small div? what are all the investors in EQT seeing that im missing.
Samuel, Ive looked at ET due to the dividend, do you see any stock price upside to ET?
tr 23%VTD and app100%5year i was buying in 2021 under $5. its payed over 7% so drip for 10yr hold is a double in what 10yr if the sp stays the same.
Growth. They are the best-positioned company for higher natty prices AND LNG exports. ET is great for income.
Anyone looking to park some funds and earn a great dividend, checkout mortgage reits AGNC and NLY – both paying over 12%, Ive held NLY for years, I considered it a safe investment and good time to buy with falling i rates
I hope you have been lucky to buy/sell at opportune times. NLY has a general downtrend in the stock price. This is because when dividends are “paid” the stock price goes down by the amount of the divvy. If there were a twin version of the stock that paid no dividends, the stock would rise in accordance with earnings. In a taxable account, long term capital gains tax rates are lower than the ordinary tax rates for dividends. Buffett prefers growth stocks with little or no dividends for this reason. This NLY stock will do better when interest rates are cut, just as most other stocks will do better, but it will not provide a greater total return from the divvy. This is one of those financial gimmicks used by Wall Street to attract investors looking for income. Yeah, get the income, pay higher taxes on dividends, get capital losses from declining stock prices, or at best lower capital gains from stock advances from lower interest rates. Total return is a BS marketing gimmick.
My TGTX stake was up 1k today!!
One of the very few NWI big winners. I am loaded with AKBA.
I have lots of TGTX. It is the safest bet for 2-5x maybe 10x from here. My average cost on AKBA is $1.50. For those not already in this, the current price of $1.32 is a great entry point. If launch in Jan 2025 is slow, it could drop to below $1. In that case, I hope they have the sense not to do a reverse split. Let them stay on the OTC market in that case. Either the product sells itself or not. The odds are good that it will do well.
Agreed
JGMD – which one is the most likely to 2X sooner, TGTX or AKBA, and whats your estimated timeframe? Thx in advance
Tough to answer. TGTX probably has less risk. I don’t know which one will have the greater long term gains. TGTX has a proven product but has gained 5X in a few years. It is interesting that MM only projects a 20% return from here, when he is usually much more optimistic about his other picks. I sat with TGTX for many years at $5 and didn’t have the guts to accumulate more at those prices.
Not knowing the future, I would buy both near current prices.
Wendy on YMB said that TGTX was up mainly because it was touted as a great stock. Cheerleading without news doesn’t thrill me. I am looking to add under $20 if there are jitters before the upcoming earnings report.
INTC – Intel
What’s your thoughts on this stock?. It’s very low at this point. Is it worth grabbing few??
John Miller was interested in Intel recently. It is possibly a good contrarian play. I don’t understand the business well enough to see if Intel can correct its mistakes.
I received this is my email today; appears to be a paid advertisement for Rocket Lab from Tips4traders. The stock was up 12.6% so I thought I would post it.
Discover Why Rocket Lab is the Hottest Space Stock You Need to Buy Now
Hannah Perry | October 16, 2024
The Space Stock That’s a Must-Buy: Rocket Lab
Are you ready to take your portfolio on a stellar ride? If you’re looking for a space industry investment, Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB) is primed for an extraordinary long-term trajectory. This emerging player in the aerospace sector has seen its stock retreat by over 50% from its 2021 highs, making it an attractive buy-and-hold candidate.
The Case for Rocket Lab as a Space Investment
With the space industry gaining momentum, pinpointing the right investment is crucial. Space is already buzzing with activity from companies launching satellites, and the tourism sector is set to amplify this growth. While heavyweights like Elon Musk’s SpaceX dominate the scene, Rocket Lab stands out as a viable alternative, giving investors the exposure they crave without betting on private companies that aren’t publicly traded.
Rocket Lab primarily focuses on providing spacecraft and rocket launch services to both commercial and government clients. Its specialty in small launches—capable of lifting up to 11,000 pounds—has allowed it to capture approximately 64% of non-SpaceX U.S. orbital launches this year. As it expands its universe to include in-space data and services, Rocket Lab is positioning itself for higher-margin recurring revenue.
Strengthening Client Relationships
The momentum Rocket Lab is building with major clients can’t be understated. Its roster includes notable partnerships with NASA, the United States Space Force, Canon, Synspective, and Tyvak, all vital as Rocket Lab eyes penetration into medium launches—SpaceX’s bread and butter. The company’s upcoming Neutron rocket, anticipated to conduct its inaugural flight by mid-2025, is pivotal. Rocket Lab estimates that the medium-launch market could be worth a staggering $10 billion.
In comparison, SpaceX raked in an estimated $8.7 billion last year, while Rocket Lab reported revenue of just $106 million in Q2, culminating in $326 million over the last four quarters. However, Morgan Stanley predicts that the global space industry could exceed a monumental $1 trillion by 2040, giving Rocket Lab ample room to compete and grow.
Financial Health and Stability
Investing in a burgeoning industry like aerospace isn’t without risk. Startups face high R&D costs, which typically make them speculative investments. Rocket Lab has burned approximately $149 million in cash over the past year but holds $497 million in cash and short-term investments, giving it a financial runway of about three years at its current burn rate.
While the company carried $405 million in long-term debt after a capital raise, typical for young companies, it’s vital to view this in context. The debt consists of convertible bonds due in 2029, giving Rocket Lab the financial clarity it needs to execute its growth initiatives—especially as Neutron gears up for launch.
Current Market Position and Future Catalysts
With the stock still down over 50% from its zenith, despite doubling over the past year, there’s an opportunity on the table. The current $5 billion market cap may seem steep against Rocket Lab’s revenue, but this is a stock where you’re betting on future potential rather than current stats. Analysts suggest the Neutron rocket’s developments could serve as a catalyst to boost market sentiment—and pair that with falling interest rates, and you’ve got a formula for potentially cheaper financing as the company amplifies its growth.
Wrapping It Up
Investing in Rocket Lab entails embracing the speculative nature of the broader space industry. This stock might not yield immediate returns, and volatility could be the name of the game. However, what you’re doing is investing in what could become a SpaceX competitor in its own right—a venture with the right tools and relationships to establish itself as a leader.
If you’re a savvy trader looking to ride the next wave of space industry growth, Rocket Lab warrants your attention. Do your due diligence, but understand that sometimes the most lucrative opportunities lie in the potential of what’s to come.
This is a paid advertisement, not a recommendation nor an offer to buy or sell securities. Our business model is to be financially compensated to market and promote public and private companies. By reading this email, our website / media webpage you agree to the terms of our disclaimer, which are subject to change at any time. We are not registered or licensed in any jurisdiction whatsoever to provide investing advice or anything of an advisory or consultancy nature and are therefore unqualified to give investment recommendations. Always do your own research and consult with a licensed investment professional before investing.
This communication is never to be used as the basis for making investment decisions and is for entertainment purposes only. At most, this communication should serve only as a starting point to do your own research and consult with a licensed professional regarding the companies profiled and discussed. Conduct your own research. Companies with low price per share are speculative and carry a high degree of risk, so only invest what you can afford to lose. By using our service you agree not to hold our site, its editor’s, owners, or staff liable for any damages, financial or otherwise, that may occur due to any action you may take based on the information contained within our website / media webpage
Banking stocks are on an uptick since the FED reduced interest rates. Including a stock called SOFI. My stake is up 41 percent. ($6200.) It has a short term target of $15.00 a share. Just FYI . Do you own due diligence.
New World Investor for 10.17.24 is posted.